Friday, December 26, 2008

Evolution Vs Creation


I remembered when I was in secondary school, knowing that I'm a christian, some friends challenge me about the theory of evolution vs theory of creation...

I didn't know what to say, because the text book tells you that Theory of Evolution is the ultimate theory on how we are here... Theory of Evolution said that human's existence are mere coincident, coincidentally micro-organism in the water evolve to fish, reptiles, birds and mammals. Then coincidentally 1 species of mammal evolved and became human...

Some problems with this theory though. Where did the human emotions, such as love, hate, and jealousy come from? Assuming that micro-organism has love, hate and jealousy.

What are the odds that the evolutionary process, proceeding by random changes, would produce human beings, plus millions of species of animals, birds, fish, and insects, all with symmetrical features? If evolution is a random process, why are all animals have symmetrical features?

What are the odds that of the millions of species of animals, birds, fish, and insects, a male of each species developed at the same time and in the same place as a female of the same species, so that the species could propagate? If evolution is a random process, why do the male and female of the same species evolve at the same time?

Why are there 2 sexes anyhow?

If the first generation of mating species didn't have parents, how did the mating pair get to that point anyhow? Isn't evolution supposed to progress when an offspring of a mating pair has a beneficial mutation? Conclusion: No parents, no evolution. A species would have to jump from a primitive form to a fully developed male and female, each with the ability and instinct to mate.

How did the heart, lungs, brain, stomach, veins, blood, kidneys, etc. develop in the first animal by slow, minute steps and the animal survive while these changes were occurring?

Did the first animal develop 10% of complete veins, then 20%, and on up to 100%, with veins throughout its entire body and brain? Then how did the heart slowly develop in the animal and get attached to the veins in the right spot?

How did the blood enter the system? The blood could not enter before the veins were complete or it would spill out. Where did the blood come from? Did the blood have red corpuscles, white corpuscles, platelets, and plasma? At what point in this process of development did the heart start beating?

My conclusion is that there are no proof to evolution theory and they may not be able to proof the Creation theory. But why is evolution theory universally accepted if there's no proof of it and be considered as "Facts"??? This of course is an admission that the foundation of evolution is not science, but a rejection of the supernatural. Evolution then is simply the best alternative anyone has been able to come up with.

As far as my knowledge of science stretch, there's no other science field like the evolution theory, where one decides on the answer first, and then looks for evidence to support that predetermined answer.

No comments:

Post a Comment